Book review, Peer review, Review, Paper, Chair, Ethics

What we learned from NeurIPS 2020 reviewing process

On Oct 17, 2020
@hugo_larochelle shared
RT @RaiaHadsell: Stats and summaries from the #NeurIPS2020 reviewing process, including answers to important q's: 'Were the desk-rejects accurate?' and 'What area has the best acceptance rate?' https://t.co/LN9KucL1cL
Open

Hsuan-Tien Lin, Maria Florina Balcan, Raia Hadsell and Marc’Aurelio Ranzato

medium.com
On Oct 17, 2020
@hugo_larochelle shared
RT @RaiaHadsell: Stats and summaries from the #NeurIPS2020 reviewing process, including answers to important q's: 'Were the desk-rejects accurate?' and 'What area has the best acceptance rate?' https://t.co/LN9KucL1cL
Open

What we learned from NeurIPS 2020 reviewing process

What we learned from NeurIPS 2020 reviewing process

Hsuan-Tien Lin, Maria Florina Balcan, Raia Hadsell and Marc’Aurelio Ranzato

What we learned from NeurIPS 2019 data

What we learned from NeurIPS 2019 data

NeurIPS has quadrupled in the last five years. This year, we had 6,743 submissions after filtering (down to 6,614 at notification time)…

It’s Time to Improve the Scientific Paper Review Process – But How?

It’s Time to Improve the Scientific Paper Review Process – But How?

In recent years however peer review processes have come under fire - especially from the machine learning community - with complaints of long delays, inconsistent standards and unqualified ...

Advice on Reviewing for EMNLP

Advice on Reviewing for EMNLP

We provide some advice to reviewers, such that we can identify the best research to be presented in the conference, and provide constructive feedback in order for authors to further improve ...

Opinion: Exorcising Ghostwriting from Peer Review

Opinion: Exorcising Ghostwriting from Peer Review

Training young scientists to review submitted manuscripts should be an academic exercise, not a facet of professional scientific publishing.

Call for Papers

Call for Papers

(Authors anticipating that they may make such a submission are free to submit their abstracts before Phase 1, in which case their paper will be included in Phase 1 bidding; however, authors ...

Is This a Paper Review?

Is This a Paper Review?

With paper submissions rocketing and the pool of experienced researchers stagnant, machine learning conferences, backs

How Should AI Be Developed, Validated, and Implemented in Patient Care?

How Should AI Be Developed, Validated, and Implemented in Patient Care?

Two concerns (unknowability of how output is derived from input and overreliance on clinical decision support systems) are main sources of ethical questions about AI in health care.